your eyes are stinking

Month

July 2010

14 posts

“Oxford spelling (or Oxford English Dictionary spelling) is the spelling used by Oxford University Press (OUP). It can be recognized for its use of British spelling combined with the suffix -ize instead of -ise. For instance, organization, privatize and recognizable are used instead of organisation, privatise and recognisable. The spelling is favoured on etymological grounds, in that -ize corresponds more closely to the Greek root, -izo, of most -ize verbs.[1] The Oxford English Dictionary (OED), which is published by OUP, explains its use of -ize as follows:
“[I]n mod.F. the suffix has become -iser, alike in words from Greek, as baptiser, évangéliser, organiser, and those formed after them from L., as civiliser, cicatriser, humaniser. Hence, some have used the spelling -ise in Eng., as in French, for all these words, and some prefer -ise in words formed in French or Eng. from L. elements, retaining -ize for those of Gr. composition. But the suffix itself, whatever the element to which it is added, is in its origin the Gr. -ιζειν, L. -izāre; and, as the pronunciation is also with z, there is no reason why in English the special French spelling should be followed, in opposition to that which is at once etymological and phonetic. In this Dictionary the termination is uniformly written -ize.
In the last few decades, the suffix -ise has become the more common spelling in the UK. Many people there incorrectly regard -ize as American English, though it has been in use in English since the 16th century. The OED lists the -ise form of words separately, as “a frequent spelling of -IZE…”.”
—

Oxford spelling - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I just lost 45 minutes of my life trying to figure out why the British edition book I was reading was able to spell ‘colour’ properly and not ‘characterize’. I still stand by -ISE spellings. 

Jul 29, 20102 notes
Jul 28, 201039 notes
Touch the Hem of His Garment Sam Cooke

southtwelfth:

S. 12th Sunday Night Gospel Hour: The Soul Stirrers, “Touch the Hem of His Garment,” 1959.

Sam Cooke on the vocals. Not racy, exactly, but there is enough yearning and sensuality in the there to make it easy for one to see why he had such an easy transition from gospel into pop. The first time I ever heard this song, when I was 15 or so, I was bedridden with a fever of 103. It was accompanied by some marvelous hallucinations, as I recall.

Also, I am considering changing the name of this regular feature to S. 12th Socialist Secular Humanist Sunday Night Gospel Hour, just so you don’t think I’m trying to pull any funny business on you.

That said, as amazing as his pop records are, I am not sure Sam Cooke ever achieved this level of excellence again. This is one of the great vocal performances of all time, as far as I am concerned. That’s just not the teenage hallucinations talking, either.

Jul 26, 201012 notes
If Britain decides to ban the burqa I might just start wearing one | Comment is free | The Observer → guardian.co.uk
Jul 25, 2010
Jul 23, 20105 notes
Jul 23, 201062 notes
Play
Jul 17, 2010
Jul 5, 201055 notes
Findings - Discovering the Virtues of a Wandering Mind - NYTimes.com → nytimes.com
Jul 3, 2010
My Job

I’ve been on maternity leave since March; I’ll be going back to work in August or September 2011. Today, I spent my entire afternoon updating my resume, researching possible jobs / careers …. I think that means I shouldn’t bother returning to work for current employer when my leave is finished. Except that it could be rude. Or not. Returning to my job then quitting 2 weeks later would definitely be meaner.

Jul 2, 2010
Thanks for the follow~~ Just wonderin', but how did you happen upon my blog?

Via the One Photo Reviews tumblr. 

Jul 2, 2010
Play
Jul 2, 201022 notes
Paul The Octopus, World Cup Genius, Makes Another Pick (PHOTOS) → huffingtonpost.com
Jul 2, 2010
David Mitchell Bends Fiction - NYTimes.com → nytimes.com
Jul 1, 20101 note
Next page →
2012 2013
  • January 5
  • February 1
  • March 2
  • April 8
  • May
  • June 3
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
2011 2012 2013
  • January 3
  • February 8
  • March 13
  • April 2
  • May 1
  • June 5
  • July 1
  • August
  • September 3
  • October 3
  • November
  • December 1
2010 2011 2012
  • January 47
  • February 13
  • March 19
  • April 13
  • May 46
  • June 23
  • July 28
  • August 8
  • September 4
  • October 1
  • November 2
  • December 1
2009 2010 2011
  • January 225
  • February 84
  • March 48
  • April 103
  • May 142
  • June 56
  • July 14
  • August 11
  • September 6
  • October 23
  • November 35
  • December 62
2009 2010
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September 69
  • October 151
  • November 222
  • December 314